Review



mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody  (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank)


Bioz Verified Symbol Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody
    Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of <t>fibronectin</t> (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.
    Mouse Anti Fibronectin Primary Antibody, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 288 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 96 stars, based on 288 article reviews
    mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Application and measurement of tissue-scale tension in avian epithelia in vivo to study multiscale mechanics and inter-germ layer coupling"

    Article Title: Application and measurement of tissue-scale tension in avian epithelia in vivo to study multiscale mechanics and inter-germ layer coupling

    Journal: Development (Cambridge, England)

    doi: 10.1242/dev.204561

    Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of fibronectin (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of fibronectin (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.

    Techniques Used: Labeling, Electroporation, Comparison, Control, Staining



    Similar Products

    96
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody
    Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of <t>fibronectin</t> (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.
    Mouse Anti Fibronectin Primary Antibody, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Novus Biologicals fibronectin primary mouse antibody 2f4
    Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of <t>fibronectin</t> (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.
    Fibronectin Primary Mouse Antibody 2f4, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fibronectin primary mouse antibody 2f4/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fibronectin primary mouse antibody 2f4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal igg3 primary antibodies against fibronectin
    Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of <t>fibronectin</t> (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.
    Mouse Monoclonal Igg3 Primary Antibodies Against Fibronectin, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal igg3 primary antibodies against fibronectin/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal igg3 primary antibodies against fibronectin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody
    Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of <t>fibronectin</t> (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.
    Mouse Anti Fibronectin Primary Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti fibronectin primary antibody
    Fig. 1. Surface microstructures of the coatings. A) Surface microstructures of the CFRPEEK before and after Ti-PIII and hybrid PDA@ZnO NPs (or PDA@ZnO-EDN1) treatment. B) Energy-dispersive X-ray mapping of the Ti-PIII/PDA@ZnO-EDN1 surface. C) Water contact angles and photographs of water droplets on different samples. D) Vickers hardness of different samples. E) Ti and Zn ions concentration after immersion for different time. F) The release of EDN1 protein after immersion for different time. G) Increased <t>fibronectin</t> adsorption on modified surfaces. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 when compared with Ti-PIII; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 when Ti-PIII/ PDA@ZnO-EDN1 compared with Ti-PIII/PDA@ZnO.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Fibronectin Primary Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti fibronectin primary antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti fibronectin primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody
    Figure 8. Maintenance of human hair dermal papilla cells (HHDPCs) on the Wnt3a gradient. A) Study design and workflow of characterizing the <t>fibronectin</t> meshwork deposited by the HHDPCs cultured on Wnt3a gradient. B) Representative immunofluorescence images of fibronectin deposited by the HHDPCs cultured on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) i) and on the NA gradient only in the culture medium ii), for 24 h. Scale bar: 100 µm. Linear regression analysis of the relationship between the area of fibronectin matrix iii), the total length of fibronectin matrix iv), the percentage (%) of the high-density fibronectin matrix v) and the lacunarity of the fibronectin matrix vi) on the Wnt3a or NA gradient. Evaluation of β-catenin nuclear accumulation in HHDPCs cultured on the Wnt3a gradient by counting the number of cells positive in the nuclear β-catenin vii). n = 4 in two independent experiments. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. C) Representative immunofluorescence images of ALP expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of ALP expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differ- ences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. *p < 0.05, ***p = 0.0002, ****p < 0.0001. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 9, 26, 32, and 30 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively. D) Representative immunofluorescence images of BMP2 expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of BMP2 expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 21, 20, 17, and 24 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively. E) Representative immunofluo- rescence images of versican expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of versican expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 12, 15, 39, and 38 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively.
    Mouse Anti Fibronectin Primary Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti fibronectin primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore mouse anti human fibronectin primary antibody
    Figure 8. Maintenance of human hair dermal papilla cells (HHDPCs) on the Wnt3a gradient. A) Study design and workflow of characterizing the <t>fibronectin</t> meshwork deposited by the HHDPCs cultured on Wnt3a gradient. B) Representative immunofluorescence images of fibronectin deposited by the HHDPCs cultured on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) i) and on the NA gradient only in the culture medium ii), for 24 h. Scale bar: 100 µm. Linear regression analysis of the relationship between the area of fibronectin matrix iii), the total length of fibronectin matrix iv), the percentage (%) of the high-density fibronectin matrix v) and the lacunarity of the fibronectin matrix vi) on the Wnt3a or NA gradient. Evaluation of β-catenin nuclear accumulation in HHDPCs cultured on the Wnt3a gradient by counting the number of cells positive in the nuclear β-catenin vii). n = 4 in two independent experiments. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. C) Representative immunofluorescence images of ALP expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of ALP expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differ- ences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. *p < 0.05, ***p = 0.0002, ****p < 0.0001. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 9, 26, 32, and 30 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively. D) Representative immunofluorescence images of BMP2 expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of BMP2 expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 21, 20, 17, and 24 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively. E) Representative immunofluo- rescence images of versican expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of versican expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 12, 15, 39, and 38 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively.
    Mouse Anti Human Fibronectin Primary Antibody, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti human fibronectin primary antibody/product/Millipore
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti human fibronectin primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of fibronectin (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.

    Journal: Development (Cambridge, England)

    Article Title: Application and measurement of tissue-scale tension in avian epithelia in vivo to study multiscale mechanics and inter-germ layer coupling

    doi: 10.1242/dev.204561

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mechanical coupling across germ layers. (A) Schematic of the embryonic region shown in B,C. Ventral view. A, anterior; ML, mediolateral; P, posterior. (B) Overlay of brightfield and fluorescent images prior to (top; applied strain E app =0) and after application of stretch to the endoderm (bottom; E app =0.6); endoderm nuclei are labeled by electroporation with pCAG-H2B-GFP (green). Magenta arrowheads and dashed yellow lines denote the positions of two nuclei and lateral somite boundaries, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Kymograph of stretch progressively applied to endoderm, illustrating concomitant deformation of somites over time. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Left: Schematic (top) and brightfield images (bottom) of the embryo following dorsal cuts to isolate ventral endoderm–somite interactions. Right: Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and dorsal cut embryos. ns, not significant ( P =0.52, Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d. (E) Transverse view of fibronectin (FN; red) staining of the endoderm–somite interface of control (top) and Dispase-treated (bottom) embryos. DAPI was used to stain nuclei (gray). en, endoderm; no, notochord; so, somite. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Quantification of applied force versus in-plane Lagrangian strain in the endoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. (G) Relative stiffness quantified from the force-strain curves shown in F. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test). (H) Comparison of Lagrangian strains in endoderm and mesoderm for control and Dispase-treated embryos. * P =0.012 (Welch's t -test on the slopes of the strain transfer per sample). Circles represent the mean, error bars represent s.d.

    Article Snippet: Embryos were washed (PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 was used for all washes) and left in blocking solution (10% heat inactivated goat serum) for 2 h, then incubated overnight at 4°C with mouse anti-fibronectin primary antibody (DSHB, B3/D6) diluted in PBS+0.1% Triton X-100 at 1:200.

    Techniques: Labeling, Electroporation, Comparison, Control, Staining

    Fig. 1. Surface microstructures of the coatings. A) Surface microstructures of the CFRPEEK before and after Ti-PIII and hybrid PDA@ZnO NPs (or PDA@ZnO-EDN1) treatment. B) Energy-dispersive X-ray mapping of the Ti-PIII/PDA@ZnO-EDN1 surface. C) Water contact angles and photographs of water droplets on different samples. D) Vickers hardness of different samples. E) Ti and Zn ions concentration after immersion for different time. F) The release of EDN1 protein after immersion for different time. G) Increased fibronectin adsorption on modified surfaces. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 when compared with Ti-PIII; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 when Ti-PIII/ PDA@ZnO-EDN1 compared with Ti-PIII/PDA@ZnO.

    Journal: Bioactive materials

    Article Title: Multifunctionalized carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone implant for rapid osseointegration under infected environment.

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.12.016

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1. Surface microstructures of the coatings. A) Surface microstructures of the CFRPEEK before and after Ti-PIII and hybrid PDA@ZnO NPs (or PDA@ZnO-EDN1) treatment. B) Energy-dispersive X-ray mapping of the Ti-PIII/PDA@ZnO-EDN1 surface. C) Water contact angles and photographs of water droplets on different samples. D) Vickers hardness of different samples. E) Ti and Zn ions concentration after immersion for different time. F) The release of EDN1 protein after immersion for different time. G) Increased fibronectin adsorption on modified surfaces. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 when compared with Ti-PIII; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 when Ti-PIII/ PDA@ZnO-EDN1 compared with Ti-PIII/PDA@ZnO.

    Article Snippet: Samples X. Wang et al. Bioactive Materials 24 (2023) 236–250 were incubated in a 24-well plate containing 1 mL Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 1 and 4 h at 37 ◦C and then treated with mouse monoclonal anti-fibronectin primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, dilution, 1:50) and antimouse secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP, Bio-Rad, MD, USA).

    Techniques: Concentration Assay, Adsorption, Modification

    Figure 8. Maintenance of human hair dermal papilla cells (HHDPCs) on the Wnt3a gradient. A) Study design and workflow of characterizing the fibronectin meshwork deposited by the HHDPCs cultured on Wnt3a gradient. B) Representative immunofluorescence images of fibronectin deposited by the HHDPCs cultured on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) i) and on the NA gradient only in the culture medium ii), for 24 h. Scale bar: 100 µm. Linear regression analysis of the relationship between the area of fibronectin matrix iii), the total length of fibronectin matrix iv), the percentage (%) of the high-density fibronectin matrix v) and the lacunarity of the fibronectin matrix vi) on the Wnt3a or NA gradient. Evaluation of β-catenin nuclear accumulation in HHDPCs cultured on the Wnt3a gradient by counting the number of cells positive in the nuclear β-catenin vii). n = 4 in two independent experiments. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. C) Representative immunofluorescence images of ALP expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of ALP expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differ- ences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. *p < 0.05, ***p = 0.0002, ****p < 0.0001. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 9, 26, 32, and 30 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively. D) Representative immunofluorescence images of BMP2 expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of BMP2 expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 21, 20, 17, and 24 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively. E) Representative immunofluo- rescence images of versican expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of versican expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 12, 15, 39, and 38 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively.

    Journal: Advanced Functional Materials

    Article Title: A Bio‐Functional Wnt3a Gradient Microarray for Cell Niche Studies

    doi: 10.1002/adfm.202301941

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 8. Maintenance of human hair dermal papilla cells (HHDPCs) on the Wnt3a gradient. A) Study design and workflow of characterizing the fibronectin meshwork deposited by the HHDPCs cultured on Wnt3a gradient. B) Representative immunofluorescence images of fibronectin deposited by the HHDPCs cultured on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) i) and on the NA gradient only in the culture medium ii), for 24 h. Scale bar: 100 µm. Linear regression analysis of the relationship between the area of fibronectin matrix iii), the total length of fibronectin matrix iv), the percentage (%) of the high-density fibronectin matrix v) and the lacunarity of the fibronectin matrix vi) on the Wnt3a or NA gradient. Evaluation of β-catenin nuclear accumulation in HHDPCs cultured on the Wnt3a gradient by counting the number of cells positive in the nuclear β-catenin vii). n = 4 in two independent experiments. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. C) Representative immunofluorescence images of ALP expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of ALP expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differ- ences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. *p < 0.05, ***p = 0.0002, ****p < 0.0001. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 9, 26, 32, and 30 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively. D) Representative immunofluorescence images of BMP2 expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of BMP2 expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 21, 20, 17, and 24 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively. E) Representative immunofluo- rescence images of versican expression in the HHDPCs maintained on the NA gradient bound with bWnt3a (LOL = 12, 100 ng of input) for 24 h i) and the quantification of the area ii) and the level iii) of versican expression. Scale bar: 100 µm. The differences of means among groups were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 post-hoc tests. ns: not significant (p > 0.05). n = 12, 15, 39, and 38 cells in 18, 27, 36, and 45 mW group, respectively.

    Article Snippet: Specifically, cells undergone fixation and permeabilization were incubated with mouse anti-fibronectin primary antibody (sc-8422, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) (1:200) and rabbit anti-β-catenin primary antibody (ab16051, Abcam) (1:150) at 4 °C for overnight.

    Techniques: Cell Culture, Immunofluorescence, Expressing